Googler
09-27 04:06 PM
All,
I wonder if more of you have noticed this phenomena: one of your applications gets approved, but the approval doesn't show up on the online case status system.
My AP was approved on Sept 17, 2007 and mailed out to my attorney who got it in a few days and told me about yesterday when I emailed about another issue. Oddly enough, even today (Sept 27), the online case status system shows an LUD of Sept 14 but no approval. I didn't get the usual approval email from the case status system either.
Annoying -- since now I won't learn of new developments till my lawyer calls me up to let me know and you know what slackers they can be. Although all this may be moot since apparently I am stuck waiting for my name check to clear, so there won't be any new developments to look look forward to for a long long time. Sigh. :(
Thanks,
Googler
I wonder if more of you have noticed this phenomena: one of your applications gets approved, but the approval doesn't show up on the online case status system.
My AP was approved on Sept 17, 2007 and mailed out to my attorney who got it in a few days and told me about yesterday when I emailed about another issue. Oddly enough, even today (Sept 27), the online case status system shows an LUD of Sept 14 but no approval. I didn't get the usual approval email from the case status system either.
Annoying -- since now I won't learn of new developments till my lawyer calls me up to let me know and you know what slackers they can be. Although all this may be moot since apparently I am stuck waiting for my name check to clear, so there won't be any new developments to look look forward to for a long long time. Sigh. :(
Thanks,
Googler
wallpaper emma watson tom felton tom
PrinceVA
05-19 04:02 PM
My I 140 approved under Eb3 if i want to change my job and my employer is willing to do in EB2 can I use my old PD from I140 EB3 ?
yup. you should have completed 180 days I guess after getting 140 approved. There are many threads for this discussion. try to find it.
yup. you should have completed 180 days I guess after getting 140 approved. There are many threads for this discussion. try to find it.
sukhpreet19
07-06 04:55 PM
Hi All,
My employer filed for my H-1B in premium processing, but it got denied because lawyer submitted wrong EIN number.
My questions are:
Will they re-consider my case if lawyer submits the correct EIN number?
How much time will it take to process, if the willing to re-consider the case?
Thanks,
SN
My employer filed for my H-1B in premium processing, but it got denied because lawyer submitted wrong EIN number.
My questions are:
Will they re-consider my case if lawyer submits the correct EIN number?
How much time will it take to process, if the willing to re-consider the case?
Thanks,
SN
2011 tom felton amp; emma watson
Macaca
06-01 07:26 PM
Pelosi�s Order in the House (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/01/us/politics/01web-hulse.html) By CARL HULSE (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/01/us/politics/01web-hulse.html), June 1, 2007
The differences between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her predecessor, J. Dennis Hastert, could not be more striking.
He is a burly former wrestling coach, a conservative Republican from small-town Illinois who usually ran from the microphones. She is the designer-clad member of a political family, a wealthy liberal from San Francisco who sees herself as a top party spokeswoman.
But what could turn out to be their defining contrast was exhibited on May 24, when Ms. Pelosi allowed the Iraq war spending bill to clear the House with predominantly Republican votes while most Democrats � including her � opposed it. It was a marked departure from the principle that guided Mr. Hastert during his years as speaker.
Mr. Hastert was an advocate of governing the House by a �majority of the majority� � a standard he thought best served the interests of his Republican members and, by extension, the nation. Just months into her tenure, Ms. Pelosi has shown she will deviate from that approach, balancing the potential of significant rewards against big risks.
The rewards could come from success in winning approval of major legislation that reaches beyond party label. Critics of Mr. Hastert said his self-imposed rule prevented the House from considering centrist social and economic measures that, in their view, could have benefited both parties. It is likely, for instance, that a coalition existed in the House last year to pass an immigration overhaul that Republicans and Democrats could have hailed going into the elections. But strong opposition from a majority of the majority derailed that idea.
The risks are related to party cohesion. If a leader such as Ms. Pelosi regularly cuts against the wishes of most of the people who put her in leadership, it stands to reason they would eventually wonder if new leadership was warranted. At a more subtle level, passing important bills with coalitions built outside party lines can expose and deepen fractures within them and sap the support of interest groups that can be essential to winning and holding onto power.
Republicans see internal problems for Democrats as they sort through how to govern. �The problem for Pelosi is that the majority of her majority still has a minority mindset,� said John Feehery, a lobbyist who was an adviser to Mr. Hastert. �They would rather protest than legislate. And that dynamic will weaken her control over the House in the long-run."
While some anti-war groups remain outraged at the war vote, many Democrats were not all that upset with the way she handled it. Through some procedural maneuvers, the speaker allowed Democrats to back a minimum wage increase and popular domestic spending and still vote against the war money. At the same time, Democrats got out of what the leadership saw as a political jam that could have left them being blamed for cutting off money to troops overseas.
The next test for Ms. Pelosi will come on looming votes over increased free trade. Many - perhaps most - House Democrats are leery of going along with the push by President Bush, free-trading Democrats and congressional Republicans for new trade deals that they believe ship jobs out of the country and lack labor and environmental safeguards.
To some veteran House Democrats, the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement is a particularly bitter memory. A majority of then-minority Republicans joined with a minority of then-majority Democrats to pass the deal sought by President Bill Clinton. Quite a few Democrats believe that approval of the trade deal over the objections of organized labor diluted union support in 1994 and contributed to the loss of Congress by the Democrats that year. Ms. Pelosi was among 102 Democrats who backed the 1993 trade deal; 156 Democrats, including the majority leader and whip, opposed it.
Anti-trade Democrats are worried the war vote foreshadowed Ms. Pelosi making a similar trade move this year, forgetting the hard lessons of NAFTA. They promise that such a decision will stir strong resentment. Ms. Pelosi has urged lawmakers not to jump to conclusions, but she is making no guarantees that legislation must have majority Democratic backing.
�I have to take into consideration something broader than the majority of the majority in the Democratic Caucus,� she told reporters.
The differences between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her predecessor, J. Dennis Hastert, could not be more striking.
He is a burly former wrestling coach, a conservative Republican from small-town Illinois who usually ran from the microphones. She is the designer-clad member of a political family, a wealthy liberal from San Francisco who sees herself as a top party spokeswoman.
But what could turn out to be their defining contrast was exhibited on May 24, when Ms. Pelosi allowed the Iraq war spending bill to clear the House with predominantly Republican votes while most Democrats � including her � opposed it. It was a marked departure from the principle that guided Mr. Hastert during his years as speaker.
Mr. Hastert was an advocate of governing the House by a �majority of the majority� � a standard he thought best served the interests of his Republican members and, by extension, the nation. Just months into her tenure, Ms. Pelosi has shown she will deviate from that approach, balancing the potential of significant rewards against big risks.
The rewards could come from success in winning approval of major legislation that reaches beyond party label. Critics of Mr. Hastert said his self-imposed rule prevented the House from considering centrist social and economic measures that, in their view, could have benefited both parties. It is likely, for instance, that a coalition existed in the House last year to pass an immigration overhaul that Republicans and Democrats could have hailed going into the elections. But strong opposition from a majority of the majority derailed that idea.
The risks are related to party cohesion. If a leader such as Ms. Pelosi regularly cuts against the wishes of most of the people who put her in leadership, it stands to reason they would eventually wonder if new leadership was warranted. At a more subtle level, passing important bills with coalitions built outside party lines can expose and deepen fractures within them and sap the support of interest groups that can be essential to winning and holding onto power.
Republicans see internal problems for Democrats as they sort through how to govern. �The problem for Pelosi is that the majority of her majority still has a minority mindset,� said John Feehery, a lobbyist who was an adviser to Mr. Hastert. �They would rather protest than legislate. And that dynamic will weaken her control over the House in the long-run."
While some anti-war groups remain outraged at the war vote, many Democrats were not all that upset with the way she handled it. Through some procedural maneuvers, the speaker allowed Democrats to back a minimum wage increase and popular domestic spending and still vote against the war money. At the same time, Democrats got out of what the leadership saw as a political jam that could have left them being blamed for cutting off money to troops overseas.
The next test for Ms. Pelosi will come on looming votes over increased free trade. Many - perhaps most - House Democrats are leery of going along with the push by President Bush, free-trading Democrats and congressional Republicans for new trade deals that they believe ship jobs out of the country and lack labor and environmental safeguards.
To some veteran House Democrats, the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement is a particularly bitter memory. A majority of then-minority Republicans joined with a minority of then-majority Democrats to pass the deal sought by President Bill Clinton. Quite a few Democrats believe that approval of the trade deal over the objections of organized labor diluted union support in 1994 and contributed to the loss of Congress by the Democrats that year. Ms. Pelosi was among 102 Democrats who backed the 1993 trade deal; 156 Democrats, including the majority leader and whip, opposed it.
Anti-trade Democrats are worried the war vote foreshadowed Ms. Pelosi making a similar trade move this year, forgetting the hard lessons of NAFTA. They promise that such a decision will stir strong resentment. Ms. Pelosi has urged lawmakers not to jump to conclusions, but she is making no guarantees that legislation must have majority Democratic backing.
�I have to take into consideration something broader than the majority of the majority in the Democratic Caucus,� she told reporters.
more...
factoryman
06-15 11:29 AM
I haven't looked, but there is a speicific link.
AOS vs Consular Processing [JH3090] (http://www.jackson-hertogs.com/JH/memos/3090.pdf)
AOS vs Consular Processing [JH3090] (http://www.jackson-hertogs.com/JH/memos/3090.pdf)
ho_gaya_kaya_?
10-22 05:09 PM
anyone- any idea ?
more...
jfredr
07-25 10:42 AM
Hey there are already couple of threads related to this check there
2010 images emma watson rupert
Blog Feeds
05-22 01:20 AM
The Washington Post reports on data released from the Border Patrol. Among the findings: - The number of Border Patrol agents has more than doubled from 9,000 in 2001 to 20,000 this year - 626 miles of the border with Mexico are now covered by fencing and vehicle barriers which is about half of the planned coverage on the 2000 mile border. - Border arrests are down from nearly 1.75 million in 2000 to 723,000 over the past year While the economy obviously plays a role, the dramatic uptick in enforcement sure is playing a role and Senator Schumer's contention...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/border-arrests-at-lowest-level-in-over-30-years.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/border-arrests-at-lowest-level-in-over-30-years.html)
more...
uslegals
01-10 09:02 AM
Admin - please block this SPAM from "Occamnben"..
hair tagged tom felton y u so sexy?
glus
01-02 12:17 PM
My attorney said she could get us to talk on one of the AILA meetings as she knows the AILA president very well. This could be awesome!! Let me know. I am from NY close to the City. She also asked if she could add link to immigrationvoice.org to her website.
more...
vkmm
10-11 06:43 PM
Guys,
Please take this with a grain of salt. This is purely for humor. Take a few minutes to enjoy :)
The Immigration Debate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhEl6HdfqWM
Federation for Immigration Reform
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RptZ89MCEX8
Bush thinks he can stop illegal immigration?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3lSOwJckzU
Stephen Colbert on Immigration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8buTOWjAD4
Lou Dobbs - Govt. lost at work
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=un44uAOULWs
Please take this with a grain of salt. This is purely for humor. Take a few minutes to enjoy :)
The Immigration Debate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhEl6HdfqWM
Federation for Immigration Reform
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RptZ89MCEX8
Bush thinks he can stop illegal immigration?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3lSOwJckzU
Stephen Colbert on Immigration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8buTOWjAD4
Lou Dobbs - Govt. lost at work
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=un44uAOULWs
hot hot dresses emma watson tom
kirupa
03-03 12:45 AM
Added!
more...
house Tom Felton
biznuge
03-09 06:11 PM
lol
tattoo dresses girlfriend emma watson and tom felton emma watson tom felton
lacrossegc
06-23 02:26 PM
Thank you Anil and Paskal !!!
Look forward to working with you guys
Look forward to working with you guys
more...
pictures Weasley) and Tom Felton
Prashanthi
06-25 05:59 PM
As long as you are in status it is fine, what you need is a valid I-94 or a receipt showing that you applied for a timely extension. You only submit documents that are asked by the officer.
dresses Tom Felton and Emma Watson
waiting4gc02
02-28 04:33 PM
Anywhere between 7-14 days..!!!
more...
makeup Together. #tom felton#emma
coopheal
12-30 03:17 PM
5. I will pay IV at least $5.00 a month
Change it to
5. I will pay IV at least $50 a month
Change it to
5. I will pay IV at least $50 a month
girlfriend wallpaper Best Kiss Emma Watson emma watson tom felton kissing. 2, Tom
rick_rajvanshi
11-12 11:54 AM
As bad as it can get for some immigrants.
Money issues may have contributed to murder-suicide | KATU.com - News, Weather and Sports - Portland, Oregon | News (http://www.katu.com/news/69805837.html)
please pray for the departed souls.
Money issues may have contributed to murder-suicide | KATU.com - News, Weather and Sports - Portland, Oregon | News (http://www.katu.com/news/69805837.html)
please pray for the departed souls.
hairstyles emma watson and tom felton
Blog Feeds
04-30 10:20 AM
From MALDEF: The effects of Arizona�s new immigration law (SB 1070) have created a national crisis that is resonating throughout the country, said NCLR (National Council of La Raza), the largest national Latino civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States. Yesterday, several members of Congress stood up and spoke out against the misguided Arizona law. �We applaud Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D�NV) and Senators Dick Durbin (D�IL), Charles Schumer (D�NY), Patrick Leahy (D�VT), Dianne Feinstein (D�CA), and Robert Menendez (D�NJ), who are set to officially unveil their outline for a comprehensive immigration reform bill this afternoon. In...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/dems-formally-unveil-immigration-proposal.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/dems-formally-unveil-immigration-proposal.html)
upuaut
08-29 02:03 AM
in order to get the animation to 'stick' you have to toggle that button that says "animate" on the top of the screen. The reason they do it that way is this. If you've already set up an animation, but then find that you need to change something in the basic structure of the item, you can turn off that toggle, edit the item and have it not effect the animation that you set up.
malibuguy007
09-11 02:57 PM
Also I have read conflicting responses e.g. some users have suggested not working and other have said you can work 180 days after EAD expires.
No comments:
Post a Comment